57 is incorporated in a decision making process , and what measures they should put in place from the start to avert or manage adverse events .
Where this is not the case , given the above , it is unlikely that apportioning all the blame to a single person or system would be appropriate . As recently stated in a report from the European Commission , “ from inception to use , best practices promoting ethical responsibility must be fostered and shared . This way , humans can remain accountable to users , instead of complex systems ”.
Akash Sachdeva , partner in litigation at London law firm Joelson , takes a more pragmatic view . He says , “ In reality , both manufacturer and owner are at risk in any claim involving AI gone wrong . And anyone wanting to sue will go after those with the deepest pockets – manufacturer or owner .
“ For me , the real issue that is going to arise is around ethical decision making . In terms of litigation , the fundamental question is whether one can still be found liable for an offence – even if the ‘ correct ’ ethical decision was made . For example , if someone purposely
aimagazine . com